It’s obviously early days and things still look a little unfinished (a scaffold tower remains at the Great George Street entrance) and I freely accept that I haven’t been able to explore the new facility in its entirety but, I have to say, I was left feeling rather underwhelmed.
Yes, there are lots of aspects of the new extension that are very good (it’s very light and airy in character, the external areas will work well during the summer months, the entrance into the auditorium is a huge improvement etc) and it will clearly provide a great new resource for the city but, especially when compared with the recently-opened extension to the Old Vic Theatre down the road (which, admittedly, was more than twice the cost), I think it falls well short of my personal expectations.
For me,
the new building seems to lack design coherence. My initial impression was that
it had been designed by a group of individuals - each responsible for
particular elements – but who hadn’t really managed to get together to coordinate
things in terms of the overall building design.
Here, for
example, are just a FEW matters that I found unsatisfactory (and, yes, I know
this is all very subjective)(photos numbered clockwise, starting top right):1. The new exposed concrete staircase immediately adjacent the entrance is fine, but sits uncomfortably with the adjacent white staircase (with its curved half-landings and solid balustrade walls)(photos 1+5).
2. I think the metal balustrading, with its vertical spindles, looks rather dated to my eyes (or perhaps the designers are TRYING to give it a retro ‘feel’?)(photos 7+9). There’s also a very strange detail at the bottom of the concrete staircase (photo 6) where the balustrade is continued back just beyond the half-landing (looking almost like an after-thought to try to prevent children from playing under the stairs!). It all looks rather awkward and incongruous.
3. In use (ie. before the performance/during the interval), there was clearly insufficient space for people to sit (there were a total of only eight small tables, I counted) or to stand against or find somewhere to put their drinks glasses while chatting. No one, it seems, had thought this through. There was a distinct lack of shelves or ledges for putting down glasses (comparison with the Old Vic is embarrassing in this respect – where they try to utilise as much space as possible for such purposes).
4. I wasn’t able to get into to the large seminar room on the first(?) floor, but noted that it had a fully-glazed wall running alongside a balcony walkway link to the ‘white staircase’ described above. The trouble was that someone had decided to install the small server counter with all its rubbish, wires and general paraphernalia exposed and visible from the walkway link. Ridiculous! (photo 2)
5. Everything looked a little bare (including the bar)(photo 8). I quite like a ‘minimalist feel’ but I don’t think they’ve got things right, here. I’ve no idea if they provide food in the bar/foyer. Hopefully, they do - but there certainly weren’t any notices or information. In fact, what little signage there was, all felt rather like an afterthought – notices/directions on music stands being placed in inconvenient locations so that people were constantly walking into them, for example (photo 1).
6. I had assumed that the old bar area would be incorporated into the new bar/reception area but it seems that most of it has been devoted to small seminar rooms(?), offices and a rather disappointing ‘history of St George’s’ display that wastefully (to my mind) utilises quite a large area.
7. I think it’s all crying out for someone to ‘take control’ of St George’s new facility… in terms of the whole experience, what it looks like, what message it conveys to its punters… and getting the small details ‘right’. At the moment, it looks a little as if no one cares (or is bothered) about such issues.
8. I could go on…
I might
be being a little unfair in this initial assessment and absolutely appreciate
that I need to visit on a number of occasions and at different times of the day
to fully appreciate how the new building is being used and what additional resources
it provides. Sadly, in addition to its design deficiencies, it left me with a
sense that it was only AFTER the building had been ‘handed over’ that anyone
had been allocated the task of actually managing its use (I may be wrong!)… so,
instead of utilising the construction time for this purpose, it felt as if there
were more important things to think about.
Yes, a wonderful new resource for the
city, but perhaps an opportunity not fully realised?PS: I know that this will seem incredibly trivial in the whole scheme of things, but I also thought that whoever chose the wine glasses ‘got it wrong’! It seems that all the glasses have 4” stems – just perfect for ‘ease-of-knocking-over’ (not that I did, you understand!). They just seem incredibly impractical or is that just me?
Photos (numbered clockwise starting, top right): 1: main stair plus signage; 2: seminar room from balcony walkway (showing back of server+ paraphernalia); 3: general view from white staircase; 4: front sitting area from white staircase; 5: white staircase; 6: balustrade rail to main staircase; 7: main staircase and walkway from front balcony walkway; 8: foyer and bar area; 9: front balcony walkway; 10: external view, with scaffold tower.
All taken very rapidly, before I wrote my blog post.
