It’s a truly fascinating, well-researched, intelligent book (and it’s very readable too). It deals with a highly complex subject in a way which is both comprehensible and hugely thought-provoking. The book begins with the spectacular collapse of the New York investment bank Lehman Brothers in September 2008 (28,000 employees and nearly $700billion of managed assets). It outlines the financial mess the bank got itself into and describes the cheating, immoral ways in which it tried to cover its tracks. It also reminds us that, despite the catalogue of errors and deceptions, none of the senior executives of Lehman Brothers went to gaol or even faced criminal charges – because the prosecutors concluded that they hadn’t actually broken the law! As Ken puts it: “the motive for deception was strong, not because the penalty for failure was severe… but because the financial reward for success was extreme”.
Ken goes on to list several other instances of individual and corporate fraud and financial deception. He also provides an enlightening mini-history of economics and capitalism – taking in the likes of Adam Smith, Karl Marx and Max Weber – before moving on to ‘postmodern capitalism’ (which he described as “capitalism that is devoid of a moral compass and resistant, if not impervious to ethical restraint”).
I found myself constantly scribbling in the margins or highlighting fact after fact (not something I usually do with books, believe me) – SO many snippets of information and detail eg. growing wage gap between corporate CEOs and the people who work for them; 1% of Americans today have an annual income 38 times greater than 90% of their fellow Americans; 78% of the US economy is now in the service sector, including financial services; (I could go on for several pages like this!).
Perhaps
not surprisingly, given his background at Gordon-Conwell , Ken is a great
advocate for the need for a different kind of capitalism to emerge – one that
begins to change the social, political, ethical AND religious drivers that have
formed our economic system from the onset. He calls this “virtuous capitalism”
and puts forward a compelling argument which re-imagines capitalism within a
faith-based ethic. He maintains that “there lies in every breast of every human
being a shrouded yet indelible knowledge of God and both an ability and a desire
to reflect the goodness of God, which explains the fact that the overwhelming
majority of people in the world (84%) still profess faith in God”. Although, as
a Christian myself, I love the concept of “virtuous capitalism”, I’m afraid
that I don’t quite share Ken’s optimism in people’s spiritual attitudes. Indeed
(and I know one can quote research paper after research paper), a recent survey
that indicates that more than half the population here in the UK has “no
religion”.
Nevertheless,
I absolutely DO agree with Ken that it is entirely possible to build a business
ethic that is universally applicable and which incorporates such features as
morality, mission, common good, openness, trust, fairness, thrift and mutuality
(I think my own architectural practice was built on such a platform). There
needs to be a change away from greedy, uncaring corporations towards business
such as Danish company Novo Nordisk (where the CEO is paid a fraction of what
similar ranked executives would make in the US; where the accounting focus incorporates
environmental and social concerns; where economic performance is measured a
20-25 year view in mind).There are far too many aspects of the book that I COULD refer to (eg. The Occupy Movement; the theology of wealth; tax avoidance; United Global Compact/the Religious Freedom+Business Foundation; the third world; world politics; rich and poor etc etc)… but you really do need to read this book for yourself!
Nearly
two years ago, I read an equally fascinating book on capitalism by Paul Mason,
entitled “Postcapitalism”… and, although written from very different
perspectives and backgrounds, there are lots of similarities – even if their
respective ‘solutions’ were fundamentally different. Much food for thought!
One of
the passages in Ken’s book related to what he called “The Geography of Virtuous
Capitalism”, namely: “Economics is indeed a global concern, and not just in our
current postmodern context, but in all future contexts as well. The resistance
of nationalists and those who gnash their teeth over the corruption and
inefficiencies of both corporate and government pan-national organisations notwithstanding,
railing against globilisation is akin to howling at the moon. The world is
small and through interconnectedness getting smaller every day. The challenge
facing our economies, political structures, and environment are becoming ever
more complex and intertwined. To become a force for good in the world, virtuous
capitalism cannot be based on a beggar my neighbour mentality or the
weaponisation of economic policies designed to give one country an advantage
over others. It must be based on a think-globally-act-locally mentality and an
ethos of shared responsibility for each other and for the planet we call home”.
This
struck a chord with me very locally (although perhaps not quite in the way Ken
envisaged). Here in Bristol, we’ve taken an initiative to introduce what we
call the ‘Bristol Pound’. It was introduced in 2012 and we have our own printed
money (and it’s also accessible digitally via smart phones) to
trade in Bristol, localising supply chains and keeping money circulating in our
city. It’s a movement, an idea, a hope, a better way of doing money… and it
works! Two years ago (this is just one example), an enlightened developer
decided to construct a scheme next to the harbourside (Wapping Wharf/Gaol Ferry
Steps) consisting of a mixed-use scheme of apartments and cafés/bars/shops/restaurants.
The developer took great care to select those he felt would complement each
other and, crucially, ensure that they were all independent, local businesses.
It’s been a phenomenal success… it’s become the go-to place in Bristol (and
many of the traders have also opted to use Bristol Pounds). The traders are
happy and the developer plays his part by ensuring that the area is kept clean
and that the development continues to ‘look the business’ (the scheme won a prestigious
heritage design award last year). As a result, a real sense of community has
developed – the traders all know each other and seem to get on wonderfully
well. So, on the back of this success, the developer put forward ideas for
further shops, a yoga/massage unit and other eating places – housed in converted
shipping container units. Again, the result has been wonderfully successful…
and the sense of community has continued to develop. The developer is now
seeking permission to build a number of small, independent office/studio units
(plus café/bar) at the opposite end of the site (again using converted shipping
containers) – a hotel is planned within the heart of the development on the
site of the old gaol. In normal circumstances, the developer might have
struggled to obtain permission for this latest proposal but, because he has a)
now developed a very successful track record, b) prospective occupiers are keen
to be associated with a development which they know will enhance the area and
its community and c) has the firm support from people who use the facilities, I
have absolutely no doubt that this latest phase of the scheme will prove equally
successful. Relatively small beginnings; a determination to do things as well
as possible (from design, environmental and organisational perspectives); being
prepared to engage with end-users AND the local community; the city council is
delighted by its success (which ‘rubs off’ on them, so they look good too!)…
Think globally, act locally? A model for the future perhaps… on a VERY small
scale?
Returning to the book, I have to say I was both
encouraged and delighted by what it had to say and how it said it. I’m one of
those people who have really struggled to come to terms with the implications
of the 2008 financial crisis (and beyond!). I’m not easily reconciled about
such matters, and yet, I finished this book feeling hopeful and even optimistic(!)
that redeeming capitalism IS possible – given time, commitment, faith, perseverance,
a sense of serving the common good and an acceptance of the need to engage with
fellow stakeholders.
I think it’s
a brilliant book and, even though you might not think so, one that you should
definitely read.
No comments:
Post a Comment