I’m
currently reading Ferdinand Mount’s book “Big Caesars and Little Caesars” (“how
they rise and fall – from Julius Caesar to Boris Johnson”). As a former editor
of ‘The Spectator’ and head of Margaret Thatcher’s think-tank, rest assured
that he’s no liberal-lefty!!
It’s a
fascinating book and well worth reading if you are ‘politically inclined’(!)…
But, with
local elections taking place tomorrow (2 May), I thought his comments about the
need for the electorate to produce photographic ID at the polling stations in
order to cast their votes were timely reminders of one of the ways we’re being manipulated
by the Conservative government - just one of five measures* he highlights (apologies
for quoting at such length, but I think it’s important):
“Voter suppression:
But of course in order to exercise
power in this exuberant style, the Tories have to acquire power and hang on to
it. The first priority is to win the upcoming general election, and prepare for
the election after that. What is the best method of improving your chances?
First, to adjust the boundaries of the constituencies to maximise the impact of
your votes... Then, not only to encourage your voters to turn out by every
possible means, but also to discourage the potential voters for the other side,
either by preventing them from registering on the electoral roll or to make it
difficult for them to cast their votes – so-called ‘voter suppression’.
Thirdly, most flagrantly, by stuffing the ballot boxes with votes by people who
don’t exist or have already voted or are not qualified to vote…
British general elections… have been
remarkably free and fair for a long time – ever since voter personation and
other dodges were finally eliminated in Northern Ireland. There has been no
substantial evidence of fraud at any recent general elections. Yet the Tories’
2019 election manifesto included this pledge: ‘We will protect the integrity of
our democracy by introducing voter identification to vote at polling stations,
stopping postal vote harvesting and measures to prevent any foreign
interference with elections’.
All this, now contained in the
Elections Act, is an egregious solution to a non-existent problem. It can have
one purpose only: to suppress the votes of the poorer and less organised voters
who are less likely to possess photo ID. When voter ID was made mandatory in
Northern Ireland in 2002, the number of voters on the new register dropped by
120,000 or 10 per cent. This suspicion is confirmed by a second pledge, to make
it easier for British expats to vote in parliamentary elections, expiates being
plausibly thought far more likely to vote Tory, just as the worst off are more
likely to vote Labour. Thus one set of voters whose fortunes do not depend on the
actions of the UK is to be encouraged, while a far larger number of voters who
do depend – often desperately – on what the British government does or does not
do for them is to be discouraged. It is hard to imagine a more flagrant
strategy to rig the result. It may be that as holding voter ID becomes more
universal over the years, the adverse effect will diminish. But what is clear
is that the MOTIVE behind the Elections Bill is to secure party advantage under
the cloak of fairness.”
Believe me, I COULD have quoted far
more extensively on this and other related subjects (eg. Trump and Johnson don’t
emerge in Mount’s book in anything like a ‘good light’!).
Be afraid. Be very afraid!
PS: * The other measures Mount refers
to (arising out of the Conservative manifesto for the 2019 general election) relate to the
following: ‘Dissolving Parliament’; ‘Sacking MPs’; ‘Sacking civil servants’ and
‘Taming the judges’.