Saturday, February 29, 2020

o’hooley+tidow at st george’s (again)…


Ruth and I went along to St George’s last night to see/hear Belinda O’Hooley and Heidi Tidow perform their eclectic mix of thought-provoking songs and intricate harmonies. This was the third time I’d seen them over the past seven years and, once again, I came away feeling very impressed.
They’ve established themselves as gifted singer-songwriters and they frequently write about difficult, painful subjects such as racism, animal cruelty, poverty, vulnerability and child abuse with remarkable, understated clarity. Over the past year or so, they’ve attracted additional admirers after their song “Gentleman Jack” (written in 2012 about 19th Century diarist, writer, traveller, mountaineer, rural gentlewoman, and industrialist Anne Lister) was featured in the BBC drama series of the same name. O’Hooley is a highly-talented musician (piano and accordion), whilst Tidow ‘limits herself’ to foot percussion and kazoo!
They both come across as rather lovely people - compassionate, sincere, down-to-earth and very amusing.
Another lovely evening… in an excellent concert venue.
Photo: O’Hooley+Tidow at last night’s concert (as you can see, we were in the gallery!)

Sunday, February 23, 2020

january-february 2020 books…


Barchester Towers (Anthony Trolloppe): Over the years, there have been LOTS of ‘classic’ novels that I’ve avoided reading… and I only decided to read this one after Moira’s bookgroup had recently enjoyed (re-)reading it. I’m very pleased I did. As you probably already know, Trollope’s book is set in the fictional cathedral town of Barchester and recounts the tales, intrigues and ambitions (and loves) amongst that pillar of Victorian society – the Church. I particularly enjoyed the names of some of the characters (Tom Towers, the Quiverfuls, Sir Omicron Pie etc) and Trollope’s observations from the perspective of the writer (eg. “We must now take leave of Mr Slope, and of the bishop also, and of Mrs Proudie. These leave-takings in novels are as disagreeable as they are in real life; not so sad…”). The writing is elegant, clever and very amusing - the plot frequently reads something akin to a ‘Whitehall farce’ (but in a good way). I think my only real criticism is that this farce has too many acts(!) - it’s a long book, written in two combined volumes, totalling over 550 pages. But a very enjoyable read nonetheless.
Factfulness (Hans Rosling): You’ve probably previously come across some of Rosling’s TED talks (that’s how I first ‘discovered’ him). This book essentially tells readers that the world isn’t quite as horrific and they thought… it attempts to train us all how to put ‘news’ into perspective and, for someone (like me!) who frequently views the world as a ‘hopeless case’, that’s got to be good news! The book is full (and I mean ‘full’) of fascinating, frequently surprising facts and statistics. Rosling is quite brilliant (he died in 2017) and, without doubt, I’ll continue to dip into this book on a regular basis… and continue to be surprised by many of its findings. I admit there were times when I found its style somewhat ‘smug’ (eg. he’d frequently provide readers with a number of statements and ask them to identify which one was actually true or most accurate. After the first few pages, you became aware that the ‘true’ one will be the one you’d probably regarded as the most unlikely… and he would be telling readers that even a bunch of chimpanzees would be more likely to choose the correct answer than you… or a group of nuclear scientists or whatever). But, hey, a fascinating and ‘hopeful’ book. 
May Week was In June (Clive James): I first read this 29 years ago (blimey)… I notice that, on the cover of my 1991 edition, Nigella Lawson – writing for ‘Book Choice’ is quoted as follows: “This is a good  book” (that’s the entire quote!). On the basis of such eloquence and insight, I think I’m going to be a book reviewer when I grow up. As you probably know, I just love James’s writing and I’ve so enjoyed re-reading this book. His final years ‘studying’ at Cambridge in the 1960s coinciding with my time starting at the School of Architecture in Oxford – so, although I was never part of the ‘Oxbridge scene’ (obviously!), I was very familiar with May Week traditions/May Balls and the like ‘by association’ (ie. by being a student in Oxford) and what else was happening in the world at that time (student riots in Paris, Vietnam war, Warsaw Pact invasion of Czechoslovakia, Bobby Kennedy+Martin Luther King Jnr assassinations, swinging 60s, music, fashion etc). He’s highly intelligent and ridiculously well-read, he’s conceited… and he’s very, very funny. This recounts the time (living something of a hand-to-mouth existence) when he threw himself in to Footlights, film reviewing, writing poetry, developing a passion for the Arts, discovering the stunning beauty of Florence, falling in love (frequently), getting married… and reading countless works of literature (anything so long as it wasn’t on the curriculum). I’m almost certainly going to have to re-read lots of his other books (I’ve got LOTS of them). I loved re-reading this one.
Heimat (Nora Krug): This is a rather poignant and beautiful book. It’s a German family album put together by a German-American woman, now living in New York, about her family’s life in Germany as the Nazis rose to power as she seeks to unearth their role in the Holocaust. Krug grew up as a second-generation German after WW2, in the shadow of her country’s past… and she decided she couldn’t know who she was without confronting where she’d come from. The entire book is handwritten and hand-drawn (almost in the form of a scrapbook), with additional photographs and extracts from old letters. Much of the book relates to her grandfather’s exploits before and during the war. She revisits her family’s ‘hometown’ in Germany; she talks to relatives of people who might have known her family… it proves to be a difficult, but important, journey. Highly original and powerful. 
Drive Your Plow Over The Bones Of The Dead (Olga Tokarczuk): I previously read this exactly a year ago but, as it’s our bookgroup’s latest book (we chose from a range of gifted authors from the EU in a sort of anti-Brexit solidarity!), I’ve just re-read it. This is what I wrote a year ago: “Man Booker International Prize-winner Olga Tokarezuk is a remarkable writer. This beautifully-written (and beautifully-translated by Antonia Lloyd-Jones) noir novel is set in a remote Polish village and is an account given by an eccentric, reclusive woman in her sixties (who believes in the stars, prefers animals to people… and is fond of the poetry of William Blake) following the disappearance of her two dogs. I found its calm-but-quirky, narrative voice strangely compelling. It’s essentially a thought-provoking, humorous crime story… and yet, it’s much more than that: it’s also about animal rights, about injustice against marginalised people and about what many would see as the hypocrisy of traditional religion. I really really enjoyed it”. In re-reading the book, I realised just how much of the detail I’d forgotten, but again found the character of the ‘madwoman’ both quirky and charming. In her Guardian review, writer Sarah Perry says this: “The novel is almost impossible to categorise. It is, in effect, a murder mystery: in the bleak Polish midwinter, men in an isolated village are being murdered, and it is left to Janina Duszejko, a kind of eastern European Miss Marple, to identify the murderer”... 
From the very first page, we learn that she (Janina Duszejko) is ‘already at an age and additionally in a state where I must always wash my feet thoroughly before bed, in the event of having to be removed by an ambulance in the Night’! I loved her narrative voice as she describes her routines, her neighbours and her struggles to come to terms with what she sees as a chaotic world. I suspect that not everyone in our bookgroup will admire it as much as I do, so our discussion will be fascinating. I’d definitely recommend it.

Wednesday, February 12, 2020

parasite…


I went along to the Watershed at lunchtime to see Bong Joon Ho’s much-acclaimed film “Parasite” (which, as I’m sure you’ve heard, was voted the Oscar’s ‘Best Picture 2020’ – plus Best Director, Best Screenplay and Best Foreign Language film).
Unsurprisingly, the cinema was COMPLETELY full, all seats sold in advance.

Set in South Korea, I’ve seen the film described as “a satirical suspense thriller” (I’m not sure if this quite does the film justice… but it’s difficult to come up with something that properly conveys its essence). Essentially, the key players (the ‘parasites’) are a somewhat dubious, street-wise, unemployed family (father, mother plus teenage son and daughter) who live in an awful basement flat in the seediest side of town and a very rich, high flying family (father, mother, teenage daughter and younger son) who live an extremely grand architect-designed, spacious house in the town’s predictably posh part.
One summer, the poor family’s son, posing as a bright, confident college student, gets the chance to tutor the rich family’s teenage daughter. The mother is duly conned and convinced she’s found the perfect tutor… and he then manages to persuade the mother to employ his sister (not that the mother knows it’s his sister) as an art tutor for her younger son. It’s all bluff and posing but, very quickly, the former unemployed siblings realise that they’re on to a ‘very good thing’… and, in turn, manage to get the housekeeper and chauffeur sacked and replaced by… their mother and father (but, again, the rich family aren’t aware of this)!
Are you following me?
I think it would be unfair to explain much more of the plot… but let’s just say that it all doesn’t end wonderfully well for any of the players (and it gives a whole new meaning to the phrase ‘Upstairs, Downstairs!).
It’s a film that highlights the contrasting worlds of the ‘haves’ and ‘have-nots’. It’s funny. It’s a cross between a horror picture and a slapstick film. It’s wonderfully put together and acted… and it’s bizarrely brilliant.
You’re really going to have to see it for yourself, aren’t you… you won’t be disappointed.

Wednesday, February 05, 2020

the lighthouse..


I went along to the Watershed this afternoon to see Robert Eggers’ film “The Lighthouse”. It’s a story/psychological thriller about two lighthouse keepers on a remote New England island in the 1890s. Ephraim Winslow (Robert Pattinson) reluctantly arrives on the island to undertake work at its lighthouse for four weeks. He’s met by veteran seafarer Tom Wake (Willem Dafoe) who is the senior officer and who issues all the orders – essentially Wake alone keeps the light in operation, while Winslow is given all the thankless, punishing physical work. And so starts a difficult, volatile, combative relationship...
It’s all pretty grim: the weather is dire pretty well throughout the film – storm-force winds, lashing rain and wild, wild seas (and accentuated by the shimmering 35mm black and white filming) – and the lighthouse keepers descend into a nightmarish world of resentment, paranoia and fear. Although the pair have moments of playful merriment (with singing, table-thumping and dancing – all largely thanks to alcohol), more and more of their time is spent in argument, physical confrontation, furious baiting and hatred.
The acting is quite brilliant and the cinematography (Jarin Blaschke) and score (Mark Korven) both a perfect match.
The film verges on being a horror movie… it’s haunting. It certainly deals with madness, loneliness, claustrophobic environment, frustration, periodic bouts of frightening drunkenness and all the awfulness of dealing with sewage, full chamber-pots, primitive facilities... and seagulls.
The dialogue is frequently mumbled – so I was delighted that I watched the Watershed’s sub-titled version
It’s a very bleak, uncomfortable film… but it’s also rather beautiful and hugely impressive.
I don't think it's a film that one can 'enjoy', as such, but I can certainly appreciate why so many film critics have been giving it five-star reviews. Definitely worth seeing.

Saturday, February 01, 2020

missing you already...


The UK bidding farewell to the EU has been the worst political experience in my lifetime. We’ve gone from those heady days of the London 2012 Olympics - when the entire country seemed to come together - to these dark days (you may have a different view on this, of course) of division, confrontation and even hatred. Despite the fact that a majority of the population voted in December for parties which supported a second referendum, Brexit has now happened (even though we still don’t know its consequences) and, clearly, we need to move on.
Today, the Guardian published a collection of impressive, thoughtful reflections from writers, artists, musicians, and cultural figures from across the EU (check it out here).
I found them hugely powerful insights into what we had lost.
Every single one of the reflections is worth reading, but here are just a few extracts:

“What breaks my heart in Britain leaving the European project is the dark message that Brexit delivers to the entire planet: every nation for itself, instead of collaborating for the common good; everybody making its own rules, instead of searching for common ground; every group competing with the others, instead of solving the common problems together. Brexit is a step in the direction of disintegration, disunity, confrontation; a path that has proven dramatically dangerous so many times in the past” (Carlo Rovelli, Physicist. Italy).

“The tragedy of Brexit is that it was shaped and designed after the referendum. Nobody ever voted for what has been done. Most people voting for Brexit had no vision or idea of all it would entail. The depth of the nonsense of ‘a little bit’ undoing 40 years of integration and shared progress only became apparent to them after the event… The other tragedy is that Labour didn’t distance itself from the Brexit project, when the neoliberal hard-right nature of its ideology came to light after 2016. Why the party and its leader remained on the fence is beyond belief” (Wolfgang Tillmans, Photographer+Turner prize-winner. Germany).

“Brexit is, above all, a lesson to those – and I’m one of them – who believe that no good can ever come from nationalism and isolationism. Brexit seduces some to fantasise about an independent Scotland and a united Ireland. Perhaps it reveals the conscious or unconscious desire to redraw borders without an actual war. Britain’s departure is not so much a bitter lesson for populists as it is a bitter defeat for those who hoped and fought for a different outcome. Ending the status quo is often not a sign of progress but just another example of the old and all too human lust for destruction” (Arnon Grunberg, writer+columnist. Netherlands).

“The EU may not be perfect but Finland has experienced unprecedented prosperity and stability since it joined. And for Finnish kids to have all of Europe open to them through Erasmus and other programmes, it’s so beautifully enriching. But more than that, the very idea is wonderful. It is utopian, it is deeply human; it puts a lot of faith in the goodness and rationality of people. I feel that there are not that many other ideas around odf that magnitude. To abandon it feels very wrong to me. The very decision to start to close your borders, to leave one of the greatest ideas of unity, friendship, liberty and peace in recent history – maybe ever – is immense” (Esa-Pekka Salonen, conductor London Philharmonia orchestra. Finland).

“I am sorry the British are leaving at a time when none of the big social problems: growing inequality or global migration, the enormous power of international corporations and financial markets, or the climate crisis, can be solved by individual nation states. I’m sorry that at a time in history crying out for internationalism that the British people have given up on their European identity. I will miss the British fighting spirit, defiance and wit, but not its contempt for the collective pursuit of a more democratic, more equal, more solidarity-based, fairer and greener Europe” (Dino Bauk, columnist and short-story writer. Slovenia).

“I have admired Britain ever since I was very young for, among other things, having just the right dose of conservatism and humour. But lately, some UK politicians have been exploring a ‘revolutionary’ style that has led to a sad loss of humour. It is hard to understand how, out of all the many imperfections in today’s world, one could choose the fragile European Union as the adversary? How can isolation be a political ideal? (Andrei Plesu, Philosopher+former foreign minister. Romania).
For me, the phrase “Missing you already” is a massive understatement.
Note: “Missing You Already”, The Guardian supplement: 1 February 2020 (editors: Katherine Butler, Mark Rice-Oxley, Joe Stone and Clare Margetson).